Топ-100
Terraforming Blog

"Global Municipal ESG-Index" Ranks Tokyo as Number One

Tokyo is ranked number one in the "Global Municipal ESG-Index" rating, designed to assess the resilience of Japanese cities to long-term significant environmental, social and governance risks (ESG - Environmental, Social and Governance) through the prism of the relevance of interest in ESG-practices for a particular region.


ESG-ratings range from leader, average to laggard.

  1. Tokyo 
  2. Nagano city 
  3. Aomori City 
  4. Wakayama City 
  5. Nagasaki City 
  6. Kobe City 
  7. Osaka city 
  8. Hiroshima city 
  9. Kumamoto City 
  10. Saitama City 
  11. Yamaguchi City 
  12. Okayama City 
  13. Kyoto City
  14. Niigata City
  15. Fukushima City
  16. Miyazaki City
  17. Shizuoka City
  18. Fukuoka City
  19. Chiba
  20. Saga City
  21. Yokohama City
  22. Kanazawa City
  23. Kochi City
  24. Yamagata City
  25. Oita City
  26. Toyama City
  27. Akita City
  28. Kagoshima City
  29. Sendai city
  30. Maebashi City
  31. Gifu City
  32. Nara city
  33. Tsu City
  34. Fukui City
  35. Matsue
  36. Nagoya city
  37. Otsu City
  38. Tokushima City
  39. Tottori City
  40. Utsunomiya City
  41. Sapporo
  42. Takamatsu City
  43. Kofu City
  44. Mito City
  45. Matsuyama City
  46. Naha city
  47. Morioka City

  1. 東京
  2. 長野市
  3. 青森市
  4. 和歌山市
  5. 長崎市
  6. 神戸市
  7. 大阪市
  8. 広島市
  9. 熊本市
  10. さいたま市
  11. 山口市
  12. 岡山市
  13. 京都市
  14. 新潟市
  15. 福島市
  16. 宮 崎 市
  17. 静岡市
  18. 福岡市
  19. 千葉市
  20. 佐賀市
  21. 横浜市
  22. 金沢市
  23. 高知市
  24. 山形市
  25. 大分市
  26. 富山市
  27. 秋田市
  28. 鹿児島市
  29. 仙台市
  30. 前橋市
  31. 岐阜市
  32. 奈良市
  33. 津市
  34. 福井市
  35. 松江市
  36. 名古屋市
  37. 大津市
  38. 徳島市
  39. 鳥取市
  40. 宇都宮市
  41. 札幌市
  42. 高松市
  43. 甲府市
  44. 水戸市
  45. 松山市
  46. 那覇市
  47. 盛岡市

https://terraforming-market.com/municipal-esg-ranking#rec422424645



HOW IS GLOBAL MUNICIPAL ESG-INDEX CALCULATED?

This methodology for assigning ESG-ratings was developed by the Institute of Environmental Conservation and Ecosystem Development Technologies.


The assignment of ESG-ratings is carried out in accordance with this methodology based on the analysis of the issuance of the Google search engine (at www.google.com) by counting the number of results for a specific date using the query formula: "region name" (in the national language according to the spelling presented in the rating )+"ESG" (in English).


To determine the "A", "B", "C" level of the city - the query formula: "name of the city" (in the national language according to the spelling presented in the rating) + "ESG" (in English) with subsequent ranking of the number of results obtained depending from the total number of results obtained by all cities participating in the rating within the country, where 80% with the largest contribution to the overall result is assigned the rating "A", 15% - "B", 5% with the minimum individual contribution to the overall result - "C";

to determine the "A", "B", "C" level of the country - "name of the country" (in the national language according to the spelling presented in the rating) + "ESG" (in English) with subsequent ranking of the number of results obtained depending on the total number the results of all countries participating in the rating, where 80% with the largest contribution to the overall result is assigned the rating "A", 15% - "B", 5% with the minimum individual contribution to the overall result - "C".


The Global Index is formed by combining a country's ranking and a city's ranking.


The assigned ESG-rating is valid for one year and is subject to mandatory revision at least once every 12 months and can be changed at any time.


Make text better
Did you find a typo, inaccuracy, or have suggestions for the text? Write to us at sayhello@terraforming-market.com
Research and recommendations For local communities and authorities